Comments on: Packaging Custom Widgets with Dojo http://brettdargan.com/blog/2006/08/14/packaging-custom-widgets-with-dojo/ λ Thoughts and rants Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:13:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: admin http://brettdargan.com/blog/2006/08/14/packaging-custom-widgets-with-dojo/comment-page-1/#comment-24 admin Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:07:35 +0000 http://brettdargan.com/blog/?p=76#comment-24 Thanks for feedback. I was in a bit of a rush in the end and wrote up the results a bit after the actual investigation. Thanks for feedback. I was in a bit of a rush in the end and wrote up the results a bit after the actual investigation.

]]> By: Sander http://brettdargan.com/blog/2006/08/14/packaging-custom-widgets-with-dojo/comment-page-1/#comment-21 Sander Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:27:41 +0000 http://brettdargan.com/blog/?p=76#comment-21 Hi Brett, Could you please clarify a couple of points you've raised about the GWT? Namely: - active monitoring: If you meant that google monitors your GWT app once deployed, then this is not true. In the 'developer' mode, the shell does a ping to find out if you're running the latest version.This does not happen in the deployed version. - components served off google: not sure what you meant here - binary format: did you mean the java-javascript compiler, that's distributed in the binary format? The output can be unobfuscated javascript if required. Regards, Sander Hi Brett,
Could you please clarify a couple of points you’ve raised about the GWT? Namely:
- active monitoring: If you meant that google monitors your GWT app once deployed, then this is not true. In the ‘developer’ mode, the shell does a ping to find out if you’re running the latest version.This does not happen in the deployed version.
- components served off google: not sure what you meant here
- binary format: did you mean the java-javascript compiler, that’s distributed in the binary format? The output can be unobfuscated javascript if required.

Regards,
Sander

]]>